AMD Radeon R9 M265X versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M265X and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M265X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 15% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 800.0 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8843 versus 3727
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.633 versus 11.448
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 525.038 versus 206.777
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.169 versus 0.792
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.076 versus 14.637
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.404 versus 20.86
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 March 2014 versus 5 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 800.0 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8843 versus 3727 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.633 versus 11.448 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 525.038 versus 206.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.169 versus 0.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.076 versus 14.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.404 versus 20.86 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
- Environ 57% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 902 MHz versus 575 MHz
- Environ 15% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.86 GTexel / s versus 25 GTexel / s
- Environ 58% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1782 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1173 versus 1133
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 versus 207
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2134 versus 1972
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2375 versus 1765
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 versus 3214
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2134 versus 1972
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2375 versus 1765
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 versus 3214
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 902 MHz versus 575 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.86 GTexel / s versus 25 GTexel / s |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1173 versus 1133 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 versus 207 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 versus 1972 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2375 versus 1765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 versus 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 versus 1972 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2375 versus 1765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 versus 3214 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1133 | 1173 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 207 | 292 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8843 | 3727 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.633 | 11.448 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 525.038 | 206.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.169 | 0.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.076 | 14.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.404 | 20.86 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1972 | 2134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1765 | 2375 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1972 | 2134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1765 | 2375 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3328 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1565 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M265X | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Venus | GK107 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 21 March 2014 | 5 June 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1197 | 1200 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.25 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 625 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 10 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 800.0 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25 GTexel / s | 28.86 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,270 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB/s | 28.51 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1125 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M265X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M265X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640
AMDRadeon R9 M265X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745A
AMDRadeon R9 M265X vs
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX
AMDRadeon R9 M265X vs
IntelHD Graphics P530
AMDRadeon R9 M265X vs
AMDRadeon R7 M520
AMDRadeon R9 M265X vs
IntelUHD Graphics
