AMD Radeon R9 M275X vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275X and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 640 vs 400
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 440.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1700 vs 525
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 247
- 9.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11041 vs 1186
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2014 vs 23 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 400 |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops vs 440.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 vs 525 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 vs 247 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11041 vs 1186 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
- Around 42% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1684 vs 1228
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3070 vs 1705
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1684 vs 1228
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3070 vs 1705
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1684 vs 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3070 vs 1705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1684 vs 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3070 vs 1705 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M275X | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 | 525 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 247 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11041 | 1186 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 283.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.407 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3265 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1228 | 1684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1705 | 3070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3265 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1228 | 1684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1705 | 3070 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M275X | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Venus | Pinewood |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 28 January 2014 | 23 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1066 | 1077 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 440.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | 11 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 627 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11.2 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |