AMD Radeon R9 M275X vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275X and NVIDIA Quadro 2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 44% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 625 MHz
• Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1537 vs 976
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11041 vs 3925
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.109 vs 11.122
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.837 vs 12.67
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.407 vs 31.168
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3265 vs 1453
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3265 vs 1453

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

• 2.3x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 328 vs 307
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 320.57 vs 283.116
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3447 vs 1228
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1705
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3447 vs 1228
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1705

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1537 976
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	307 328
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11041 3925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.109 11.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	283.116 320.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.837 12.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	91.407 31.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3265 1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1228 3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3265 1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1228 3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705 3353

Compare specifications (specs)