AMD Radeon R9 M375X vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375X and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1015 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1742 vs 1626
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3548 vs 2536
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3548 vs 2536
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9124 vs 5885
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1015 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1742 vs 1626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3548 vs 2536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3548 vs 2536 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9124 vs 5885 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 315
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1586 vs 1333
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1586 vs 1333
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 vs 2185
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 vs 2185
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1586 vs 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1586 vs 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 vs 2185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 vs 2185 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375X
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M375X | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1742 | 1626 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 | 572 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3548 | 2536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3548 | 2536 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9124 | 5885 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1333 | 1586 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 | 1586 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2185 | 2418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2185 | 2418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M375X | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | Tropo | Broadwell GT3e |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 5 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 897 | 724 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1015 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | |
| Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 189 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M375X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470M
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
AppleM2 8-core
