AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 M375X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 M375X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 331
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2380 vs 1333
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2380 vs 1333
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2185
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2185
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2380 vs 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2380 vs 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 2185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 2185 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1015 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1735 vs 935
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8255 vs 5635
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3548 vs 1935
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3548 vs 1935
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1015 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1735 vs 935 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8255 vs 5635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3548 vs 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3548 vs 1935 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M375X
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 331 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 935 | 1735 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5635 | 8255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 | 3548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 | 3548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2380 | 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2380 | 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 2185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 2185 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 M375X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Oland | Tropo |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 898 | 899 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 1015 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 40.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470M
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX150
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM vs
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
