AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M380 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 10.6 billion / sec
- 5.3x more pipelines: 768 vs 144
- 4.5x better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 339.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2774 vs 811
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 203
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12703 vs 12379
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s vs 10.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 144 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 339.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 vs 811 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 vs 203 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12703 vs 12379 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 536
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2855
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 536
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2855
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 vs 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 2855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 vs 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 2855 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 | 811 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 | 203 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12703 | 12379 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 536 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2855 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 536 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2855 | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Strato | GF106 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 3 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 877 | 880 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 339.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 144 |
| Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 10.6 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA cores | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 60.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M380 with others
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 445M
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
