Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD Radeon R9 M380
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon R9 M380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1564 vs 536
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1564 vs 536
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2855
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2855
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 vs 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 vs 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2855 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380
- 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
- Around 74% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2774 vs 1594
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 362
- Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12660 vs 7093
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3688 vs 2652
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3688 vs 2652
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 883 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 vs 1594 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 vs 362 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12660 vs 7093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 vs 2652 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M380
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD Radeon R9 M380 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1594 | 2774 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 530 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7093 | 12660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 2855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 2855 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Strato |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 873 | 875 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 768 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,080 million |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
TrueAudio | ||
ZeroCore |