Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD Radeon R9 M380

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon R9 M380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1564 vs 536
  • 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1564 vs 536
  • Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2855
  • Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2855
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 January 2017 vs 5 May 2015
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1564 vs 536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1564 vs 536
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 2855
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 2855

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380

  • 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
  • Around 74% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 883 gflops
  • Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2763 vs 1590
  • Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 528 vs 377
  • Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12839 vs 7012
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3688 vs 2652
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3688 vs 2652
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 768 vs 48
Floating-point performance 1,536 gflops vs 883 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2763 vs 1590
PassMark - G2D Mark 528 vs 377
Geekbench - OpenCL 12839 vs 7012
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3688 vs 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3688 vs 2652

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M380

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1590
2763
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
377
528
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7012
12839
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2652
3688
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2652
3688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1564
536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1564
536
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
2855
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
2855
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 AMD Radeon R9 M380
PassMark - G3D Mark 1590 2763
PassMark - G2D Mark 377 528
Geekbench - OpenCL 7012 12839
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2652 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2652 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1564 536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1564 536
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 2855
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 2855
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 34.701
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 546.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 48.878
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 194.051

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 AMD Radeon R9 M380

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 2.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e Strato
Launch date 3 January 2017 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 851 863
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 900 MHz
Floating-point performance 883 gflops 1,536 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 768
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 2,080 million
Texture fill rate 48 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 96 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
AMD Eyefinity
DirectCompute 5.0
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
TrueAudio
ZeroCore