AMD Radeon R9 M390 vs AMD FirePro M6100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M390 and AMD FirePro M6100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, API support, Memory, Technologies, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 39.059
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 750.731
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 3.395
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 57.283
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 166.915
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 4537
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2517
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 4537
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2517
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 09 June 2015 vs 16 October 2013 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 vs 39.059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 vs 750.731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 vs 3.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 vs 57.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 vs 166.915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 4537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 4537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2517 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52486 vs 20286
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1803 vs 1232
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1803 vs 1232
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52486 vs 20286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1803 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1803 vs 1232 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6100
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD FirePro M6100 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20286 | 52486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 39.059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 750.731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 3.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 57.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 166.915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 4537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 4537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 1803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 2517 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2195 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD FirePro M6100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Pitcairn | Saturn |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 09 June 2015 | 16 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 857 | 860 |
Type | Mobile workstation | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |