AMD Radeon R9 M390X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M390X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1344
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 2,961 gflops vs 2,634 gflops
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3627
- 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 3354
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3627
- 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 3354
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 25 August 2013 |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1344 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops vs 2,634 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 vs 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 vs 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 723 MHz
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 109.8 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5427 vs 3597
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 694 vs 435
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8276 vs 6508
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8276 vs 6508
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 109.8 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5427 vs 3597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 694 vs 435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8276 vs 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8276 vs 6508 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3597 | 5427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 435 | 694 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22044 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.199 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1284.053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.881 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 312.822 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6508 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6508 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M390X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Amethyst | GK104 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 25 August 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 315 | 316 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 915 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 2,634 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,540 million |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |