AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W8000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and AMD FirePro W8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 715 vs 528
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4916 vs 4164
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 14 June 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 715 vs 528 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4916 vs 4164 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8000
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 834 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 93.41 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 3,226 gflops vs 2,989 gflops
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5460 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24518 vs 23546
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.628 vs 56.272
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 387.109 vs 336.811
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 834 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s vs 93.41 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops vs 2,989 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 5460 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24518 vs 23546 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.628 vs 56.272 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 387.109 vs 336.811 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition | AMD FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 715 | 528 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4916 | 4164 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23546 | 24518 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.272 | 64.628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 778.867 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.051 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.535 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.811 | 387.109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7400 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7400 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition | AMD FirePro W8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Grenada | Tahiti |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 14 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 436 | 437 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 834 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,989 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1792 |
| Texture fill rate | 93.41 GTexel / s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 174.7 GB / s | 176 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5460 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition with others
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 + nForce 730i
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
ATIFirePro V8700
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5165
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
AMDFirePro W8000
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
IntelArc A550M
