AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 910x more memory clock speed: 5460 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 715 vs 642
  • Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.535 vs 36.842
  • Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.811 vs 215.546
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 19 February 2013
Memory clock speed 5460 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 715 vs 642
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 65.535 vs 36.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 336.811 vs 215.546

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

  • 2x more texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 93.41 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 2688 vs 1792
  • Around 58% better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 2,989 gflops
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8223 vs 4916
  • Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24400 vs 23546
  • Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 62.027 vs 56.272
  • Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1218.137 vs 778.867
  • Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.835 vs 5.051
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 837 MHz vs 834 MHz
Texture fill rate 187.5 billion / sec vs 93.41 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2688 vs 1792
Floating-point performance 4,709 gflops vs 2,989 gflops
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8223 vs 4916
Geekbench - OpenCL 24400 vs 23546
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 62.027 vs 56.272
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1218.137 vs 778.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.835 vs 5.051

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
715
642
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4916
8223
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
23546
24400
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
56.272
62.027
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
778.867
1218.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.051
5.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
65.535
36.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
336.811
215.546
Name AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
PassMark - G2D Mark 715 642
PassMark - G3D Mark 4916 8223
Geekbench - OpenCL 23546 24400
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 56.272 62.027
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 778.867 1218.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.051 5.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 65.535 36.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 336.811 215.546
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2901

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 Kepler
Code name Grenada GK110
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date 5 May 2015 19 February 2013
Place in performance rating 436 433
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $2,054.59
Value for money (0-100) 5.09

Technical info

Core clock speed 834 MHz 837 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,989 gflops 4,709 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1792 2688
Texture fill rate 93.41 GTexel / s 187.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 6,200 million 7,080 million
Boost clock speed 876 MHz
CUDA cores 2688

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 174.7 GB / s 288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 384-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed 5460 MHz 6.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
TrueAudio
ZeroCore
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA