AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 910x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5460 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 715 versus 642
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.535 versus 36.842
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.811 versus 215.546
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 19 February 2013 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5460 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 715 versus 642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.535 versus 36.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.811 versus 215.546 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 187.5 billion / sec versus 93.41 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 2688 versus 1792
- Environ 58% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,709 gflops versus 2,989 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8223 versus 4916
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 24400 versus 23546
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 62.027 versus 56.272
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1218.137 versus 778.867
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.835 versus 5.051
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 837 MHz versus 834 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 187.5 billion / sec versus 93.41 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2688 versus 1792 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,709 gflops versus 2,989 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8223 versus 4916 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24400 versus 23546 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 versus 56.272 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 versus 778.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 versus 5.051 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 715 | 642 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4916 | 8223 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23546 | 24400 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.272 | 62.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 778.867 | 1218.137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.051 | 5.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.535 | 36.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.811 | 215.546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Grenada | GK110 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 19 February 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 436 | 433 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Prix maintenant | $2,054.59 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 834 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,989 gflops | 4,709 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2688 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 93.41 GTexel / s | 187.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,200 million | 7,080 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 876 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2688 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 174.7 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5460 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 + nForce 730i
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
ATIFirePro V8700
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5165
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
AMDFirePro W8000
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs
IntelArc A550M
