AMD Radeon R9 M395X vs AMD Radeon HD 7970

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M395X and AMD Radeon HD 7970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970

• Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 118.4 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
• Around 28% better floating-point performance: 3,789 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
• Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34541 vs 27734
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 84.413 vs 65.367
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1390.592 vs 799.421
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.336 vs 5.718
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 101.929 vs 71.057
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 481.76 vs 413.329
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9448 vs 7365
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 2154
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9448 vs 7365
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 2154

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M395X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	27734 34541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.367 84.413
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	799.421 1390.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.718 7.336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.057 101.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	413.329 481.76
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7365 9448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2154 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7365 9448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2154 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3350

Compare specifications (specs)