AMD Radeon R9 M470 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M470 and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon R9 M470

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 17% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 771 MHz
Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47924 vs 12294

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 May 2016 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 771 MHz
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	47924 vs 12294

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

2.1x more texture fill rate: 98.69 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
Around 54% better floating-point performance: 2,369 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3118 vs 2331
Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 365 vs 307
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1804
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1804
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 1674
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 1674

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	98.69 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1536 vs 768
Floating-point performance	2,369 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3118 vs 2331
PassMark - G2D Mark	365 vs 307
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 1804
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 1804
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362 vs 1674
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362 vs 1674

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M470
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2331

3118

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

307

365

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

47924

12294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1804

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1804

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1674

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1674

3362

Name	AMD Radeon R9 M470	NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2331	3118
PassMark - G2D Mark	307	365
Geekbench - OpenCL	47924	12294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1804	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1804	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1674	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1674	3362
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		5.972
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		355.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		15.706
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		34.772
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		6747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		6747

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 M470	NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Kepler
Code name	Strato	GK104
Launch date	15 May 2016	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	762	764
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Price now		$309.99
Value for money (0-100)		13.80
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	900 MHz	771 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,536 gflops	2,369 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	1536
Texture fill rate	48 GTexel / s	98.69 GTexel / s
Transistor count	2,080 million	3,540 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		100 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size	large	large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB / s	115.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	3600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
DirectCompute 5.0
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus