AMD Radeon R9 M470 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M470 and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47924 vs 11751
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47924 vs 11751 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 98.69 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
- Around 54% better floating-point performance: 2,369 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3163 vs 2331
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 307
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1804
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1804
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 1674
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3163 vs 2331 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 vs 307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M470
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M470 | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2331 | 3163 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 363 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47924 | 11751 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1804 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1804 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.972 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.022 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M470 | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Strato | GK104 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 762 | 764 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $309.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 771 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 98.69 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |