AMD Radeon R9 M470 vs NVIDIA GRID K520
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M470 and NVIDIA GRID K520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 745 MHz
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 160
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47924 vs 10864
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 vs 160 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47924 vs 10864 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520
- 43.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 768
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,448 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3516 vs 2331
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 1804
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 1804
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 1674
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 vs 2331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M470
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K520
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M470 | NVIDIA GRID K520 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2331 | 3516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 160 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47924 | 10864 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1804 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1804 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.97 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M470 | NVIDIA GRID K520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Strato | GK104 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 762 | 763 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2x 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 |