AMD Radeon R9 M470X vs AMD Radeon R9 285
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M470X and AMD Radeon R9 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 918 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3043
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3043
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2782
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2782
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 2 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 918 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 2782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 2782 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285
- Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 102.8 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1792 vs 896
- Around 67% better floating-point performance: 3,290 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 3244
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 426
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 102.8 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,290 gflops vs 1,971 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 vs 3244 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 vs 426 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M470X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 285
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M470X | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3244 | 6680 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | 597 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3043 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57109 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 2782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 2782 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.799 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.632 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.369 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.954 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 391.399 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2778 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M470X | AMD Radeon R9 285 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Strato | Tonga |
| Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 2 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 462 | 464 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 918 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | 3,290 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1792 |
| Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s | 102.8 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 5,000 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 176.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M470X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M470X vs
ATIRadeon X700 SE
AMDRadeon R9 M470X vs
ATIFireGL V7200
AMDRadeon R9 M470X vs
ATIFireGL V5200
AMDRadeon R9 M470X vs
AMDRadeon R9 285
AMDRadeon R9 M470X vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000M
AMDRadeon R9 M470X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q
