AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 Nano and ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 25.6x more texture fill rate: 256.0 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
Launch date | 27 August 2015 vs 24 January 2006 |
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 500 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1450 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Nano
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
Name | AMD Radeon R9 Nano | ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4607 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 137 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 507 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | R500 |
Code name | Fiji | R580 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 | 24 January 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Place in performance rating | 491 | 293 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | 384 million |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 152 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0c |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 46.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |