AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 Nano and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 256.0 GTexel / s vs 76.8 billion / sec
- 16x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2x 128
- 10.7x better floating-point performance: 8,192 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 197 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB
Launch date | 27 August 2015 vs 18 March 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s vs 76.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2x 128 |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 197 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Nano
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
Name | AMD Radeon R9 Nano | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4607 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 798 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3238 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3238 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Fiji | G92 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 | 18 March 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $599 |
Place in performance rating | 491 | 487 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops | 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2x 128 |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s | 76.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 197 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | 754 million |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 256 (128 per GPU) | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, HDMIDual Link DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 152 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
SLI options | Quad | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 128 (64 per GPU) |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |