AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 M385X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
  • Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 67.2 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4102 vs 1994
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 575 vs 267
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6821 vs 4079
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 August 2016 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed 1090 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Texture fill rate 67.2 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4102 vs 1994
PassMark - G2D Mark 575 vs 267
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6821 vs 4079

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385X

  • 895.9x better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49760 vs 17433
  • 35.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4079 vs 115.4
Specifications (specs)
Floating-point performance 1,971 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 49760 vs 17433
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4079 vs 115.4

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M385X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4102
1994
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
575
267
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
17433
49760
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6821
4079
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
115.4
4079
Name AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) AMD Radeon R9 M385X
PassMark - G3D Mark 4102 1994
PassMark - G2D Mark 575 267
Geekbench - OpenCL 17433 49760
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 55.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 969.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 76.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 239.111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6821 4079
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 115.4 4079
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1728
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) AMD Radeon R9 M385X

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 GCN 2.0
Code name Baffin Strato
Design Radeon RX 400 Series AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
GCN generation 4th Gen
Launch date 8 August 2016 5 May 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $86
Place in performance rating 570 573
Price now $179.50
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 33.86

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1100 MHz
Compute units 14
Core clock speed 1090 MHz 1000 MHz
Floating-point performance 2.2 TFLOPs 1,971 gflops
GPU Power 35-48 Watt
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 896 896
Stream Processors 896
Texture fill rate 67.2 GTexel / s 61.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 70 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 2,080 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bridgeless CrossFire
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 170 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 400 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12 12
OpenCL 2.0 Not Listed
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 112 GB/s 76.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz 1500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 4K Support
PowerTune
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore
DirectCompute 5.0
DualGraphics
HD3D
Switchable graphics