AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs ATI Radeon E2400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) and ATI Radeon E2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 28x more texture fill rate: 67.2 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- 22.4x more pipelines: 896 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 78.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4105 vs 52
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 287
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 August 2016 vs 28 June 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 67.2 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 40 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4105 vs 52 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 vs 287 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E2400
- 21.8x better floating-point performance: 48 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 70 Watt
| Floating-point performance | 48 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 70 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E2400
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | ATI Radeon E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4105 | 52 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 287 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17594 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6821 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 115.4 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1728 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | ATI Radeon E2400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | Baffin | RV610 |
| Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 8 August 2016 | 28 June 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | |
| Place in performance rating | 571 | 569 |
| Price now | $179.50 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 33.86 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Compute units | 14 | |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2.2 TFLOPs | 48 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 40 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Texture fill rate | 67.2 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-II |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 11.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) with others
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6610 XL
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
ATIRadeon E2400
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5010M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 M385X
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
