AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 79% higher texture fill rate: 137.5 GTexel / s vs 76.8 billion / sec
- 8x more pipelines: 2048 vs 2x 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 197 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 6.6x more memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Launch date | 4 August 2016 vs 18 March 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 137.5 GTexel / s vs 76.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 2x 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 197 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 926 MHz
- 156.7x better floating-point performance: 2x 384.0 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3238 vs 1674
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3238 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 926 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 384.0 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3238 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3238 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33840 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3238 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3675 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 798 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Ellesmere | G92 |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 | 18 March 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | $599 |
Place in performance rating | 491 | 488 |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | 2x 384.0 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 128 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 137.5 GTexel / s | 76.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 197 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 256 (128 per GPU) | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, HDMIDual Link DVI |
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 128 (64 per GPU) |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |