AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) versus NVIDIA Tesla M60
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) and NVIDIA Tesla M60 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 66% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 926 MHz versus 557 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1206 MHz versus 1178 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 32% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6600 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 33812 versus 29243
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 versus 1451.124
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 versus 8.266
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 versus 70.038
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 versus 314.404
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 versus 8663
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2443 versus 886
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 versus 8663
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2443 versus 886
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 versus 30 August 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz versus 557 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33812 versus 29243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 versus 1451.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 versus 8.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 versus 70.038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 versus 314.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 versus 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 versus 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 versus 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 versus 886 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M60
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 137.5 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2x 2048 versus 2048
- 1972.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 4,833 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2x 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 114.389 versus 111.543
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1791 versus 1674
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1791 versus 1674
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 137.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 versus 2048 |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 4,833 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2x 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.389 versus 111.543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1791 versus 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1791 versus 1674 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M60
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Tesla M60 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33812 | 29243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 114.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 1451.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | 8.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | 70.038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | 314.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 1791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 8663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 1791 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3675 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7551 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Tesla M60 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | Ellesmere | GM204 |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 490 | 487 |
Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz | 557 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | 2x 4,833 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 2048 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 137.5 GTexel / s | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2x 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 211 GB/s | 2x 160.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |