AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 420.6x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 210 Watt
- 8.9x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1572 MHz
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 14 August 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 210 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1572 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1138 MHz vs 1036 MHz
- 2.5x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1408
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12822 vs 9813
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12822 vs 9813
- Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62260 vs 35118
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 vs 367
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12354 vs 4307
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1138 MHz vs 1036 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12822 vs 9813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12822 vs 9813 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62260 vs 35118 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 vs 367 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 vs 4307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3695 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 12822 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35118 | 62260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 828 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4307 | 12354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3353 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 153.117 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.138 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.901 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 126.528 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1172.788 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 14 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 384 | 237 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 1138 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 302.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 210 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 9,677 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1572 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |