AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD FirePro W8100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD FirePro W8100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

AMD FirePro W8100

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1036 MHz vs 824 MHz
965.1x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 131.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
2.6x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 220 Watt
2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 5494
Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 5494
Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35118 vs 34705

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 23 June 2014
Core clock speed	1036 MHz vs 824 MHz
Texture fill rate	127.2 GTexel/s vs 131.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 220 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9813 vs 5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9813 vs 5494
Geekbench - OpenCL	35118 vs 34705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 3349

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8100

Around 82% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1408
2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 717 vs 367
Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7279 vs 4307

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2560 vs 1408
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	717 vs 367
PassMark - G3D Mark	7279 vs 4307
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3699 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3699 vs 3695

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8100

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9813

5494

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9813

5494

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

35118

34705

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

367

717

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4307

7279

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3349

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3349

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	AMD FirePro W8100
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9813	5494
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9813	5494
Geekbench - OpenCL	35118	34705
PassMark - G2D Mark	367	717
PassMark - G3D Mark	4307	7279
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		93.339
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2333.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		8.816
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		112.45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		440.107

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	AMD FirePro W8100
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	Navi 14	Hawaii
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	23 June 2014
Place in performance rating	384	386
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1445 MHz
Compute units	22
Core clock speed	1036 MHz	824 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	254.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.138 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.069 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1408	2560
Pixel fill rate	46.24 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	127.2 GTexel/s	131.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	220 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	6,200 million
Floating-point performance		4,219 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
HDMI
DisplayPort count		4
Dual-link DVI support
HD сomponent video output
StereoOutput3D
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length
Length		279 mm
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	168.0 GB/s	320 GB / s
Memory bus width	96 Bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5