AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 9313
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 9313
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 1024 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 vs 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 vs 9313 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1036 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1445 MHz
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 36495
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 443 vs 415
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7201 vs 4847
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1036 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1445 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 85 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 vs 36495 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 443 vs 415 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7201 vs 4847 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3695 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 9313 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36495 | 38863 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 | 443 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4847 | 7201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 14 | TU117 |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 376 | 379 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 114.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | 7.311 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | 57.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5300M with others
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
ATIRadeon X800 GT
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 150M
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K6000
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
AMDFirePro S9050
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
