AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 1284 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 9258
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 9258
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35118 vs 34853
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 15 October 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz vs 1284 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 vs 9258 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35118 vs 34853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1168 MHz vs 1036 MHz
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 661 vs 367
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7711 vs 4307
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz vs 1036 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 vs 367 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7711 vs 4307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3695 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 9258 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35118 | 34853 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 661 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4307 | 7711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3785 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 15 October 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 384 | 335 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 1284 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 1168 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | |
Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |