AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 774x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel/s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
- Around 31% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 85 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s vs 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 85 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- 1344.2x better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 341
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 2016
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14269 vs 9416
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 2296
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 2296
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 vs 341 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3032 vs 2016 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14269 vs 9416 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 vs 2296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 vs 2296 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 | 460 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2016 | 3032 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9416 | 14269 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2296 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2296 | 3667 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.283 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 815.354 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.437 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.718 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.258 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4468 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4468 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde | Tobago |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 638 | 641 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,613 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.50 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 32 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 165 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 104.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM with others
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5950 Ultra
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1300
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
ATIFireGL V3100
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 360 OEM
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
AMDFirePro S7150
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
