AMD Radeon RX 550 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 830.773
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 10 November 2016 |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 830.773 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 1183 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- 2050x better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3676 vs 2690
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 476
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17696 vs 11610
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.077 vs 33.507
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.132 vs 3.064
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.584 vs 52.533
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 225.985 vs 140.911
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5431 vs 4485
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1123 vs 940
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2678 vs 2158
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5431 vs 4485
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1123 vs 940
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2678 vs 2158
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz vs 1183 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3676 vs 2690 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 vs 476 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17696 vs 11610 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.077 vs 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 vs 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 vs 52.533 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 vs 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 vs 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2678 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5431 vs 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2678 vs 2158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 3676 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 634 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 17696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 55.077 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 830.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 4.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 82.584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 225.985 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 5431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 2678 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 5431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 2678 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 550 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Baffin |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 10 November 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 876 | 596 |
Price now | $75 | $259.99 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | 19.63 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | 1201 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 2,460 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | 76.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |