AMD Radeon RX 550 vs AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2739 vs 916
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 302
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11667 vs 5782
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 12.111
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 253.178
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 1.211
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 23.777
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 73.506
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 1645
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2158 vs 1677
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 1645
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2158 vs 1677
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 30 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2739 vs 916 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 302 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11667 vs 5782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 vs 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 vs 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 vs 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 vs 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 vs 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 vs 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 vs 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 vs 1677 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- 499.2x better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 940
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 940
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 vs 940 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2739 | 916 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 302 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11667 | 5782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 1677 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1200 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 550 | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Oland |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Place in performance rating | 870 | 1208 |
Price now | $75 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | 780 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 730 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 599.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |