AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 888 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5600 MHz
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 27 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 823 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz vs 888 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 512
- 1705x better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11779 vs 11659
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 940
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2158
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 940
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2158
- 10.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1333 vs 127
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11779 vs 11659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1333 vs 127 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2717 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11659 | 11779 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 1333 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Lexa | GK104 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 27 June 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Place in performance rating | 889 | 891 |
Price now | $75 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | 888 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 823 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 2,046 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1152 |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | 85.25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 134.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |