NVIDIA T400 vs AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1183 MHz
- 903.3x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17008 vs 11628
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 vs 33.507
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 vs 3.064
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 52.533
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 vs 140.911
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 vs 4485
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2173 vs 940
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2158
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 vs 4485
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2173 vs 940
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2158
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 18 April 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 1183 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 37.86 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17008 vs 11628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 vs 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 vs 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 vs 52.533 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 vs 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 vs 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 vs 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 2158 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 420 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 785.059
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 420 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 785.059 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T400 | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17008 | 11628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 1037.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 52.533 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 2158 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2718 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 129 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Lexa |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 885 | 888 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $75 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1183 MHz |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 37.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 2,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | 400 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |