NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 33.507
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.816 vs 140.911
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 940
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2158
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 940
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2158
- 7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 888 vs 127
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 vs 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 vs 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 vs 127 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2717 vs 2399
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 240
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11659 vs 9257
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 535.24
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 2.64
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 44.7
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 4027
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 4027
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 937 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2717 vs 2399 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 vs 240 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11659 vs 9257 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 535.24 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 vs 2.64 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 vs 44.7 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 vs 4027 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 vs 4027 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2399 | 2717 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 478 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9257 | 11659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | 1037.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | 52.533 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 | 127 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP108B | Lexa |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 886 | 889 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $75 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1183 MHz |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 2,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |