AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon HD 7750M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and AMD Radeon HD 7750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 8826.1x more texture fill rate: 162.4 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 1408 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 7.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9120 vs 1191
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 693
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3722 vs 3551
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3722 vs 3551
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Dec 2019 vs 24 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9120 vs 1191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 vs 693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 vs 3551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 vs 3551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750M
- 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 130 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon HD 7750M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9120 | 1191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 | 693 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44514 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | 3551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | 3551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4878 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon HD 7750M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Chelsea |
Launch date | 12 Dec 2019 | 24 April 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Place in performance rating | 293 | 291 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.196 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s | 18.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 1,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 7.09 inches (180 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |