NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1408
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 130 Watt
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 vs 12 Dec 2019 |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1408 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 162.4 GTexel/s vs 79.68 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 479
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9120 vs 7757
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44514 vs 43474
- Around 24% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4878 vs 3931
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s vs 79.68 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 vs 479 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9120 vs 7757 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44514 vs 43474 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4878 vs 3931 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 | 775 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7757 | 9120 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43474 | 44514 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3931 | 4878 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Navi 14 |
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 | 12 Dec 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 292 | 293 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 1845 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 159.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.20 TFLOPS (2:1) | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.100 TFLOPS | 5.196 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1408 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | 59.04 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s | 162.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 130 Watt |
Compute units | 22 | |
Transistor count | 6400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | 7.09 inches (180 mm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | Dual-slot |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |