AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 96.2x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 12500 million
- 17.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.328 vs 12.678
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Dec 2019 vs 19 March 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 12500 million |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 vs 12.678 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 162.4 GTexel/s
- 2.2x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1408
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 vs 9164
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53429 vs 44855
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 135.416 vs 128.135
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 vs 2024.814
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 vs 742.778
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 vs 11075
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3722
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3367
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 vs 11075
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3722
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3367
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 162.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 vs 9164 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53429 vs 44855 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 vs 128.135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 vs 2024.814 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 vs 742.778 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 vs 11075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 vs 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 3367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 vs 11075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 vs 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 3367 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9164 | 11300 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 784 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44855 | 53429 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | 135.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | 3063.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | 12.678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | 883.876 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 10411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 10411 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4894 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Vega 10 PRO |
Code name | Navi 14 | Greenland |
Launch date | 12 Dec 2019 | 19 March 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Place in performance rating | 288 | 228 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | 499.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.97 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.196 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1408 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | 83.20 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 12500 million |
Transistor count | 6400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 7.09 inches (180 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |