AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT versus AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 42% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1845 MHz versus 1300 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- 96.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 130 Watt versus 12500 million
- 17.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.328 versus 12.678
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Dec 2019 versus 19 March 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz versus 1300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt versus 12500 million |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 versus 12.678 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Environ 54% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 249.6 GTexel/s versus 162.4 GTexel/s
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 3072 versus 1408
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 versus 9164
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 53429 versus 44855
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 135.416 versus 128.135
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 versus 2024.814
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 versus 742.778
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 versus 11075
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 versus 3722
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 versus 3367
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 versus 11075
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 versus 3722
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 versus 3367
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s versus 162.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 versus 1408 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 versus 9164 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53429 versus 44855 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 versus 128.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 versus 2024.814 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 versus 742.778 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 versus 11075 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 versus 3722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 versus 3367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 versus 11075 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 versus 3722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 versus 3367 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9164 | 11300 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 784 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 44855 | 53429 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | 135.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | 3063.269 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | 12.678 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | 883.876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | 11925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | 3947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 10411 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | 11925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | 3947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 10411 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4892 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Vega 10 PRO |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | Greenland |
| Date de sortie | 12 Dec 2019 | 19 March 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 288 | 228 |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Génération GCN | GCN 5.0 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 22 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | 499.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.97 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.196 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | 83.20 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 162.4 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 12500 million |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 7.09 inches (180 mm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 2048 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT vs
AMDFireStream 9170
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT vs
AMDFireStream 9270
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT vs
AMDRadeon R9 290X
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4200 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570
