AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 960 MHz
Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1200 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 540

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 Dec 2019 vs 29 January 2019
Core clock speed	1607 MHz vs 960 MHz
Boost clock speed	1845 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	775 vs 540
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3722 vs 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3367 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3722 vs 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3367 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

Around 36% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1408
Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 130 Watt
Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11353 vs 9104
Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17150 vs 11075
Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17150 vs 11075
5.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5888 vs 1032

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1920 vs 1408
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt vs 130 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	11353 vs 9104
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	17150 vs 11075
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	17150 vs 11075
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5888 vs 1032

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9104

11353

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

775

540

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11075

17150

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3722

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3367

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11075

17150

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3722

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3367

3358

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1032

5888

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark	9104	11353
PassMark - G2D Mark	775	540
Geekbench - OpenCL	44527
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	128.135
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2024.814
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	13.328
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	125.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	742.778
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11075	17150
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3722	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3367	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11075	17150
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3722	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3367	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1032	5888

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 14	TU106B
Launch date	12 Dec 2019	29 January 2019
Launch price (MSRP)	$169
Place in performance rating	306	197
Type	Desktop, Laptop	Laptop
Price now		$349.99
Value for money (0-100)		62.74
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1845 MHz	1200 MHz
Compute units	22
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	960 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	324.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	10.39 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.196 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1408	1920
Pixel fill rate	59.04 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	162.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt	80 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	10,800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	7.09 inches (180 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	450 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Width	Dual-slot
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	224 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support