AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 1754.9x more texture fill rate: 162.4 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9110 vs 3851
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 vs 487
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44510 vs 22044
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 128.135 vs 64.199
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2024.814 vs 1284.053
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.328 vs 5.881
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.474 vs 78.169
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 742.778 vs 312.822
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11075 vs 6508
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11075 vs 6508
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Dec 2019 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 723 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9110 vs 3851 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 vs 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 44510 vs 22044 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 vs 64.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 vs 1284.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 vs 5.881 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 vs 78.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 vs 312.822 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 vs 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 vs 6508 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- Around 45% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1408
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3722
- 7.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 3367
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3722
- 7.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 3367
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1408 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 vs 3722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 vs 3367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 vs 3722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 vs 3367 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9110 | 3851 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 44510 | 22044 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | 64.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | 1284.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | 5.881 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | 78.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | 312.822 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | 8593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 24690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | 8593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 24690 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1035 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Amethyst |
| Launch date | 12 Dec 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Place in performance rating | 308 | 311 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.196 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 7.09 inches (180 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT vs
ATIFireGL V7600
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT vs
AMDFireStream 9250
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390X
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT vs
AMDRadeon R9 380X
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2200
