AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and NVIDIA Quadro P2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 162.4 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
• Around 10% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1280
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44510 vs 32372
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 128.135 vs 121.124
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2024.814 vs 1958.592
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.328 vs 8.452
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.474 vs 120.742
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 742.778 vs 510.941
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3367 vs 1676
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3367 vs 1676

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 130 Watt
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9353 vs 9110
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 899 vs 774
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 11075
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 11075
• 3.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 vs 1035

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9110 9353
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	774 899
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	44510 32372
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	128.135 121.124
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2024.814 1958.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.328 8.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	125.474 120.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	742.778 510.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11075 11437
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3722 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3367 1676
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11075 11437
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3722 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3367 1676
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1035 3404

Compare specifications (specs)