AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 875 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 928 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
| Launch date | 4 July 2017 vs 7 November 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 875 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 928 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 210 billion / sec vs 65.8 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2880 vs 896
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 5,345 gflops vs 2,106 gflops
| Texture fill rate | 210 billion / sec vs 65.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,345 gflops vs 2,106 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9457 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 632 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28360 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.429 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.854 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.067 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 182.11 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3390 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | GK110B |
| Launch date | 4 July 2017 | 7 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 393 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Price now | $749.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.80 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz | 928 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops | 5,345 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2880 |
| Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s | 210 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 7,080 million |
| CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 336 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||