AMD Radeon RX 560 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2.7x more core clock speed: 1090-1175 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 16320x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s
• 51.2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 20
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3657 vs 630
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 486 vs 314
• 18x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 vs 3210
• 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.81 vs 8.844
• 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 775.281 vs 171.17
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.602 vs 1.115
• 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.428 vs 10.385
• 20.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 vs 12.361
• 6.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6571 vs 988
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2808
• 6.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6571 vs 988
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2808
• 9.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1774 vs 194

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1200-1275 MHz
• 19.2x better floating-point performance: 50 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
• Around 78% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 60-80 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3657 630
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	486 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57671 3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.81 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	775.281 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.602 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.428 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	257.062 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6571 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6571 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 2808
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1774 194

Compare specifications (specs)