AMD Radeon RX 560 versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 560 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 560
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 10 mois plus tard
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1090-1175 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 81.60 GTexel/s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 51.2x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 20
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 5.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3657 versus 630
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 486 versus 314
- 18x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 versus 3210
- 6.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.81 versus 8.844
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 775.281 versus 171.17
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.602 versus 1.115
- 6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.428 versus 10.385
- 20.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 versus 12.361
- 6.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6571 versus 988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 2808
- 6.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6571 versus 988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 2808
- 9.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1774 versus 194
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 3 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1090-1175 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s versus 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 20 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3657 versus 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 486 versus 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 versus 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 versus 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 versus 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 versus 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 versus 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 versus 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 versus 194 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1200-1275 MHz
- 19.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 50 gflops versus 2.6 TFLOPs
- Environ 78% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 60-80 Watt
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1200-1275 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops versus 2.6 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 60-80 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 560 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3657 | 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 486 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 | 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 | 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 | 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 | 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 | 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 560 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | Polaris 21 | Haswell GT2 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 3 June 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 513 | 1359 |
Prix maintenant | $104.99 | |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 54.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200-1275 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 14/16 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1090-1175 MHz | 400 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2.6 TFLOPs | 50 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 20 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s | 5 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Longeur | 170 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Quick Sync |