AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 and NVIDIA Tesla K40c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1090-1175 MHz vs 745 MHz
• 456.4x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 178.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 60-80 Watt vs 245 Watt
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 325
• 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 vs 17468

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40c

• 2.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1024
• 1650.4x better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
• 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4495 vs 3648
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 61.566 vs 56.81
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1779.043 vs 775.281
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.463 vs 4.602
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 103.169 vs 64.428
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 308.261 vs 257.062

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40c

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3648 4495
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	488 325
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57671 17468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.81 61.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	775.281 1779.043
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.602 6.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.428 103.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	257.062 308.261

Compare specifications (specs)