AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 1378.4x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 vs 15667
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.602 vs 4.039
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 vs 245.081
- Around 12% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1774 vs 1591
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 7 February 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 vs 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 vs 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 vs 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 vs 1591 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1090-1175 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1200-1275 MHz
- 728.5x better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 60-80 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4464 vs 3648
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 596 vs 488
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 56.81
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 832.248 vs 775.281
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 64.428
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 6571
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 6571
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 1090-1175 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1200-1275 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 60-80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4464 vs 3648 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 vs 488 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 vs 56.81 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 vs 775.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 vs 64.428 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 vs 6571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 vs 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 vs 6571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 vs 3688 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3648 | 4464 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 596 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 | 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 | 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 | 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 | 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 | 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 | 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GP107 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 7 February 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | $375 |
Place in performance rating | 529 | 530 |
Price now | $104.99 | $319.99 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 54.35 | 15.53 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200-1275 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Core clock speed | 1090-1175 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 1,894 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt | 47 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 145 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |