AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 591.5x more texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3560.776 vs 2513.321
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 vs 19.708
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 vs 43.083
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13621 vs 10966
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3686
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13621 vs 10966
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3686
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 6 April 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 vs 2513.321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 vs 19.708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 vs 43.083 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 vs 10966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 vs 10966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- 7.6x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 vs 13674
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 879
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65404 vs 64852
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 256.103 vs 207.909
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1139.382 vs 1111.648
- Around 32% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10148 vs 7706
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1405 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 vs 13674 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 vs 879 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65404 vs 64852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 vs 207.909 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 vs 1111.648 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10148 vs 7706 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13674 | 17881 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 934 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64852 | 65404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 256.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 2513.321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 19.708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 43.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 1139.382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 10966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 10966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7706 | 10148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 10 XLE | GP102 |
| Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 6 April 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $1,199 |
| Place in performance rating | 191 | 212 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Price now | $1,200 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.97 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1405 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 11408 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDFirePro W9100
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro VII
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
