AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 584.9x more texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13622 vs 12470
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 732
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.909 vs 174.714
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 vs 17.305
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3336
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3336
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 10 July 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13622 vs 12470 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 vs 732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 vs 174.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 vs 17.305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 26% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65451 vs 64794
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 3560.776
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 148.938
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 1111.648
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13848 vs 13621
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13848 vs 13621
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65451 vs 64794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 vs 3560.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 148.938 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 vs 1111.648 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13848 vs 13621 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13848 vs 13621 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13622 | 12470 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 | 732 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64794 | 65451 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 174.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 3924.968 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 17.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 175.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 1226.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | Navi 10 XLE | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 10 July 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $1,599 |
| Place in performance rating | 205 | 208 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 12,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1890 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDFirePro W9100
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT vs
AMDRadeon 780M
