AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs AMD FirePro W9100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1130 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 1372x more texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 750 Watt
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13622 vs 7580
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 747
- Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64794 vs 43046
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.909 vs 106.585
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3560.776 vs 1878.403
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 vs 9.751
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 vs 82.208
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1111.648 vs 511.115
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13621 vs 9143
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13621 vs 9143
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 26 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 750 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13622 vs 7580 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 vs 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64794 vs 43046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 vs 106.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 vs 1878.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 vs 9.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 vs 82.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 vs 511.115 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 vs 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 vs 9143 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100
- Around 22% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2304
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3719
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3358
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3719
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD FirePro W9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13622 | 7580 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 | 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64794 | 43046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 106.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 1878.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 9.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 82.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 511.115 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 32085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 32085 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 XLE | Hawaii |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 26 March 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Place in performance rating | 205 | 203 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s | 163.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 750 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,238 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 275 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |