AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 83.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 12500 million
- 15.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55515 vs 53886
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3947
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3947
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 19 March 2019 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 12500 million |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55515 vs 53886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3947 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 182.2 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 vs 8809
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 489
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 vs 11117
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 7694
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 vs 11117
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 7694
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 182.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 vs 8809 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 vs 489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 vs 11117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 7694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 vs 11117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 7694 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8809 | 11300 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 489 | 784 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55515 | 53886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 10411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 10411 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Vega 10 PRO |
Code name | Navi 10 | Greenland |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 19 March 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 228 | 230 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 12500 million |
Transistor count | 10300 million | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |