AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 527.2x more texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 7.6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1572 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3709
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3353
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3709
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 27 June 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1572 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12920 vs 8809
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 489
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71252 vs 55515
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13339 vs 11117
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13339 vs 11117
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 vs 8809 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 vs 489 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71252 vs 55515 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 vs 11117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 vs 11117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8809 | 12920 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 489 | 797 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55515 | 71252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1729.558 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 228 | 229 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 12,500 million |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1572 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |