AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1265 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 677.8x more texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 11.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11117 vs 8673
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3361
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11117 vs 8673
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3361
- Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5931 vs 5170
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 24 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 vs 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 vs 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5931 vs 5170 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9577 vs 8809
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 802 vs 489
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9577 vs 8809 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 802 vs 489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 vs 8904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 vs 8904 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8809 | 9577 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 489 | 802 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55515 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5931 | 5170 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 155.307 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 857.575 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Fiji |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 24 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 228 | 231 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,602 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 191 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |